Forrester Total Economic Impact™ study finds Edwin AI delivered a 313% ROI for composite organization.

[Read more](/content/resources/logicmonitor-edwin-ai-total-economic-impact-study-by-forrester "The Total Economic Impact™ of LogicMonitor Edwin AI"/index.html)

The SRE Report 2026

Eighth edition of researching all things reliability by Catchpoint, part of LogicMonitor

The SRE Report 2026 is a research report on five trends in site reliability engineering, including performance and uptime, AI and toil, chaos engineering and resilience engineering, integrated platforms and AI/ML reliability, and learning time in reliability teams

[Download full report](/content/resource/sre-report-2026 "Download report"/index.html)

49% of respondents say AI adoption has decreased toil.

17% of organizations run chaos or resilience engineering experiments in production regularly.

55% of teams spend a fair amount or a lot of time integrating or connecting tools.

13% feel very or extremely confident in monitoring AI/ML reliability.

6% have dedicated, protected learning time during work hours.

In this article

Key Findings Snapshot

Key findings from The SRE Report 2026 include AI toil reduction, production chaos engineering adoption, tool integration effort, AI/ML reliability confidence, and protected learning time.

Report Summary

Reliability Has Moved Beyond Uptime

The SRE Report 2026 is a research report about five major trends in modern reliability practice. The report shows that reliability is expanding beyond uptime and now includes application performance, customer experience, AI-assisted operations, resilience testing, integrated tooling, AI/ML reliability monitoring, and technical learning time. The report is organized into five official insight sections: Reliability Redefined: Speed Is the New Trust; AI: From Toil to Transformation, Maybe; Break What You Build; Get the Resilience You Give; Rewiring Reliability: AI as the Foundation of the Modern Stack; and The Growth Imperative: Learning Is Reliability’s Last Frontier.

Reliability Trends in 2026: Performance, Customer Experience, and Business KPIs

AI: From Toil to Transformation, Maybe.

This section covers how reliability is changing from a narrow uptime metric into a broader measure of application performance and digital experience. The report shows that many respondents treat application performance degradation as seriously as downtime. The report also shows that organizations are still earlier in connecting reliability work to business outcomes such as revenue, NPS, business KPIs, and customer experience.

Key findings in this section:

• 67% use dashboards or alerts to detect or mitigate performance degradations.
• 54% use active monitoring such as synthetic probes or synthetic testing.
• Only 26% directly evaluate whether application performance improvements affect business metrics such as NPS or revenue.
• 22% formally model the cost of downtime or severe performance degradation to inform decision-making and prioritization.
• 21% say reliability is measured as a formal business KPI tied to outcomes or objectives.

The SRE Report 2026 says organizations increasingly treat application performance as part of reliability, but most still do not consistently connect reliability improvements to business outcomes such as revenue, NPS, or formal KPIs.

AI and Toil in SRE: How AI Changes Repetitive Work, Automation, and Agent Adoption

Reliability Redefined: Speed Is the New Trust.

This section covers how AI affects toil in site reliability engineering and operations work. The report defines toil as repetitive work that slows productivity. The median reported toil is 34% of work. Nearly half of respondents say AI adoption has decreased toil, but the results are uneven, and perceptions differ by role. Leaders are more likely than individual contributors to say AI has reduced toil. The report also shows strong momentum toward agentic AI and LLM-based agents in the next 12 months.

Key findings in this section:

• Median toil is 34% of work.
• 49% say AI adoption has decreased toil.
• 35% say AI adoption has made no change to toil.
• 16% say AI adoption has increased toil.
• 60% of directors say AI has reduced toil, compared with 38% of individual contributors.
• 38% plan to implement agentic AI or LLM-based agents in the next 12 months.
• 18% say their organization has already implemented agentic AI or LLM-based agents.

Plain-language summary: The SRE Report 2026 says AI is reducing toil for many teams, but the benefits are uneven across roles. Leadership reports more AI-related toil reduction than practitioners, and many organizations are actively planning or already implementing agentic AI and LLM-based agents.

Chaos Engineering and Resilience Engineering: Production Testing, Failure Injection, and Organizational Tolerance

Break What You Build; Get the Resilience You Give.

This section covers both chaos engineering and resilience engineering, including production testing, failure injection, and organizational tolerance for deliberate disruption. The report says resilience must be practiced, not assumed. While many organizations say reliability should align with customer experience and business KPIs, only a minority regularly run chaos or resilience engineering experiments in production. The report also shows that many organizations still have low tolerance for planned failure injection.

Key findings in this section:

• 47% say the top priority over the next 12 months is aligning reliability with business KPIs or customer experience.
• 17% run chaos or resilience engineering experiments in production regularly.
• 35% run those experiments occasionally.
• 34% have never run those experiments in production.
• 19% describe organizational tolerance for planned failure injection as very low, and 26% describe it as low.
• Non-technical audiences find “Resilience Engineering” and “Resilience Testing” clearer than “Chaos Engineering.”

The SRE Report 2026 says resilience engineering is widely valued, but production chaos testing is still uncommon. Many organizations remain cautious about deliberate failure injection, which limits their ability to build operational confidence before real incidents happen.

Integrated Platforms, Best-of-Breed Tools, AI/ML Reliability, and Tool Integration Effort

Rewiring Reliability: AI as the Foundation of the Modern Stack.

This section covers observability stack and reliability stack design, integrated platforms, best-of-breed tools, data fragmentation, tool integration effort, and AI/ML reliability monitoring. The report shows that teams are split between integrated platform preferences and best-of-breed tooling, but many still spend substantial time connecting tools. The report argues that AI works better when signals, workflows, governance, and data are unified. The report also finds low confidence in monitoring AI/ML reliability.

Key findings in this section:

• 45% prefer an integrated platform, fully or partially.
• 36% prefer best-of-breed tools, fully or partially.
• 18% say they have no consistent approach.
• 55% spend a fair amount or a lot of time integrating or connecting tools.
• Only 13% feel very or extremely confident in the ability to assess and monitor AI/ML component reliability.
• Most respondents are at least somewhat comfortable with AI-generated suggestions during incident response, but comfort varies by rank.

The SRE Report 2026 says operational fragmentation remains a major issue. Many teams still spend significant time connecting tools, and confidence in AI/ML reliability monitoring is low. The report argues that AI creates more value when teams build on integrated, governed, high-quality signals.

Learning Time, Upskilling, Talent Retention, and Reliability Team Growth

The Growth Imperative: Learning Is Reliability’s Last Frontier

This section covers technical upskilling, protected learning time, career growth, and retention risk in reliability teams. The report says modern reliability depends on people learning continuously, but most respondents have limited time to do that during work hours. The report positions learning as both a resilience issue and a retention issue, not just a professional development issue.

Key findings in this section:

• Most respondents spend 3 to 4 hours per month on technical upskilling or learning.
• Only 6% have dedicated, protected learning time during work hours.
• 51% say more competitive compensation would make them seriously consider leaving.
• 31% say better growth and learning opportunities would make them seriously consider leaving.
• 31% also cite healthier work-life balance.

The SRE Report 2026 says learning is now part of reliability capability. Most engineers get only limited time for upskilling, protected learning time is rare, and lack of growth opportunities contributes to retention risk.

Methodology

About This Research

The SRE Report 2026 is based on a survey that was open during July and August 2025. The survey received 418 responses from respondents around the world across reliability roles, ranks, industries, regions, and company sizes. The demographics page shows the largest regional share came from North America.